One current Government consultation (responses to DfEE
by 25th April) is on Foundation degrees.
An interesting idea.
But what should a foundation degree look like?
What are degrees for?
Once it was said that a Classics degree equipped you to do anything.
In later, more scientific times, a Chemistry degree was seen as just
as good.
And in truth, most chemists and classicists ended up as successful managers, lawyers,
churchmen, accountants, even Prime Ministers.
Horace and hydrogen bonds were soon forgotten.
What remained were the habits and attitudes of thought and learning.
It wasn't so much a degree in chemistry as a degree in how to learn.
And therein lies one danger with Media Studies or Consumer Affairs.
You don't have to grapple with a real academic discipline in depth
You skate over a thousand ponds, without bothering too much about what lies underneath.
It's not just that you end up an expert in nothing.
You never really learn how to learn either.
To be a good generalist, you have to learn how to be a specialist in something first.
The nature of the speciality is largely irrelevant.
So when the Government says that Foundations degrees are to develop "the key skills
which graduates need in order to contribute to their full potential in all sectors of
the labour market", I applaud.
But when on the same page it says the "subject content will be vocational", that they
will "emphasise work experience" and "raise the value of vocational and technical
qualifications", I start to worry.