A Definition for E-Learning - Page 2 of 2 |
When is it 'e-'?
It rapidly became clear that there are situations where technology-based training is not e-learning and the matrix should show, or at least describe, which these are.
Using the matrix, any form of technology-based training could be defined as a 1-2-2 or a
0-4-2.
Examples
1. A man using a media rich CD-ROM based programme with video and sound, delivered on a standalone PC in an open learning centre would be an example of a 4-0-0. This is because any learning support would be obtained by the learner's own actions by say, going to the library or looking up something on the internet. If this person accessed a tutor while he was in the OLC that would make it a 4-1-2 and if he would have contacted the tutor when he returned to his desk it would be a 4-1-1.
2. A text only, internet-delivered course with a live tutor would be a 0-4-2. The same course delivered only via a company intranet would be a 0-2-2. (Note: it is assumed that the intranet reaches everyone in the organisation and allows access to other learners, tutors and support services. If it does not, then to a certain degree it disqualifies itself as a medium in its own right and you would choose Level 0?)
3. Where does this leave the paper-based materials? This is obviously not digitally delivered and hence does not figure in this exercise at all. If however they were digitally distributed and then printed out they could be Levels 0 or 1 in Type of Content. If the support materials were delivered digitally they do not necessarily make the combination e-learning and it would probably fall into the category of self generated support.
It must be emphasized that the numbering does not in any way imply quality. A 0-0-0 could be absolutely perfect in some situations just as a 4-4-2 could be in others. The measurement of quality is separate question altogether.
So how would this be used in real life?
An organisation wishing to use computers to deliver training will either commission learning content, or purchase it "off-the-shelf". They can use the matrix to work out which learning will work in their
organisation. More importantly, if they finally decide that what they need is not e-learning then there will be no confusion when they brief the producer.
After all, no one uses e-learning just because it is the latest buzzword (!)
To reiterate, this is not claimed to be the final word on the matter. On the contrary, the objective is to foster discussion so that an agreed definition or series of definitions can be arrived at that we can all adopt with confidence.
To contribute please email either
|
