Distributed Learning is a relatively rare term.    For every mention of distributed learning on the web, there are 25 for distance learning, according to Google.

But it has it advocates, who claim that it "will become the dominant paradigm for education" [1].    Centres are dedicated to its advancement [2], committees to its evaluation [3], and organisations to its promotion [1].

So what is distributed learning?   For some, it is simply another term for distance learning [4].

Others disagree.    "Distributed learning is not just a new term to replace distance learning" says one [5];   "it is essential not to confuse the two" says another [6].

For some, the key is in the choice of the word distributed [5].    Distributed learning differs from distance learning in that it has many components, which are located in a range of places.

One differentiates it from distance learning by defining it as "a deliberate mix of face-to-face teaching and online learning" [6].   Trouble is, this is exactly the same definition as is used for blended learning.

Computers are often mentioned in attempted definitions.    One group effectively equates it with onlline learning [12].

Another defines it as "an instructional model that involves using various information technologies to help students learn" [7] and equates it to "computer-mediated" instruction.

Others agree that technology is essential but emphasise that computers are just one component of this [8], [2] & [9].

Others take an opposite view:  that distributed learning "emphasises learning rather than the technology used or the separation between teacher and learner" [11].    Others also stress that it is learner-centred, [6], but then so is all good quality open and distance learning.

Some lapse into hyperbolic pithiness "distributed learning is learning outside the box" [1], others into downright incomprehensibility like "it embodies digital fusion" [10].

There may be a satisfactory definition somewhere but, so far at least, I have failed to find it.    So, despite being around for several years, distributed learning seems to lack both precision and popularity.

Is it serving a useful purpose?   Aren't there already too many terms in this area?   Perhaps we can just ignore it.   After all, it will soon be overtaken by the next piece of neophilic nomenclature.